A Study of the Term Monogenēs in the Gospel of John

  • Adi Putra Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Pelita Dunia, Indonesia
Keywords: Monogenes, Divinity of Jesus, Only Begotten, Christology, Gospel of John

Abstract

This research explores whether the expression monogenes represents the meaning of a child, an only child, or whether it is intended to emphasize begotten children. This topic is important to research because errors in understanding the meaning of the expression monogenes will have implications for understanding Christology. The term monogenes has generated much debate. The most prominent discussion is whether this expression wants to emphasize only or only begotten. Therefore, the author seeks to find the answer through this research. The method used is a literature study focusing on the term monogenes used in the Gospel of John. The research results show that the term monogenes in the Gospel of John emphasizes the exclusive relationship between Jesus Christ and God the Father where this relationship does not have to be in the framework of a metaphysical relationship or begotten relationship - because that is not what the term monogenes wants to emphasize - but rather the specificity of that relationship later. At the same time, he noted that Jesus was essentially the same as the Father. The explanation above is based on the realization that the term monogenes does not come from the word genna but from the word genos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burk, D. (2016). Jauh di dalam Gulma di MONOGENES dan Generasi Kekal. Denny Burk: Sebuah Komentar tentang Teologi, Politik dan Budaya.

Caffese, D. (2005). The Meaning of Monogenes in The Gospel John. SGBC.

Carson, D. A. (1991). The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel According to John. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Carson, D. A. (2012). Kesalahan-kesalahan Eksegetis. Momentum.

Grudem, W. (1994). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Bible Doctrine. Zondervan Publishing House.

Kittel, G., Bromiley, G. W., & Friedrich, G. (1964). Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Vol. 9). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Köstenberger, A. J. (2009). A Theology John’s Gospel and Letters: The Word, the Christ, the Son of God. Eerdmans Publishing.

Manurung, P. (2016). Studi Eksegetis Yohanes 1:1-18 Sebagai Apologetik Terhadap Kristologi Saksi Yehuwa. Journal Kerusso, 1(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.33856/kerusso.v1i2.49

Michaels, J. R. (2010). The Gospel of John (The New International Commentary on the New Testament). Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Morris, L. (1971). The International Commentary On The New Testament: The Gospel According To John. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Putra, A. (2019). Pra-Eksistensi Yesus Berdasarkan Bukti-Bukti Injil Yohanes. DIDACHE, 1(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.55076/didache.v1i1.24

Putra, A., & Manu, C. B. S. (2021). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Kristologi dalam Islam. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v2i1.53

Santoso, D. I. (2014). Theologi Yohanes: Intisari dan Aplikasinya. SAAT.

Sudarma, P. H., Andreas, D., & TH, M. (2021). Doktrin Inkarnasi Kristus: Memahami Pengajaran Alkitab Tentang Kenosis Dan Hypostatic Union Serta Implikasinya Bagi Orang Percaya. PBMR ANDI.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tenney, M. C. (1981). The Expositor’s Bible Commentary with NIV: John. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Wallace, D. B. (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond and Basics. An Exegetical Syntax of The New Testament. Zondervan Publishing House.

Wungow, J. (2019). Analisis Kritis terhadap Pluralisme Agama berdasarkan Yohanes 14: 6 Bagi Mahasiswa Stt Yestoya. RHEMA: Jurnal Teologi Biblika dan Praktika, 5(1).

Zed, M. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor.

Published
2023-12-19
How to Cite
Putra, A. (2023). A Study of the Term Monogenēs in the Gospel of John. VISIO DEI: JURNAL TEOLOGI KRISTEN, 5(2), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.35909/visiodei.v5i2.409
Section
Original Articles