THE IMPACT OF LEARNING STRATEGIES THROUGH VISUALIZATION IN CHRISTIAN EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF 5.0 SOCIETY
Abstract
Technological developments in the 21st century have made enormous changes in modern human civilization today. Internet technology has changed every human life using innovative technology in the palm. In the context of education, especially this visualization learning strategy, this is the impact of renewable learning strategies that help the world of education dashed, measurably and easily accessible anytime and anywhere. Research on the impact of learning strategies through visualization in Christian education in the era of Society 5.0 shows that the challenge of using innovative technology is one of the benefits both educators and students face to innovate in teaching. The most crucial question in education today is the impact of implementing effective visual learning strategies for students in the era of Society 5.0. The result is that the effectiveness of Christian religious education learning strategies through visualization can be measured by the method's ability to enable the target students to achieve the desired learning outcomes of instruction.
Downloads
References
Aisami, R. S. (2015). Learning styles and visual literacy for learning and performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.508
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Burmark, L. (2006). Visual Literacy: Learn To See, See To Learn—Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Cascante-Gómez, F. A. (2008). Advancing Racial/Ethnic Diversity in Theological Education: A Model for Reflection and Action. Theological Education, 43(2), 21–40.
Cranton, P. (2012). Planning Instruction for Adult Learners. Wall & Thompson.
Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dimyati, M. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.
Ely, N. F., & Abdu, A. R. N. (2020). Kesiapan Pendidikan Indonesia Menghadapi era society 5.0. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v5i12020p061
Eunike, P., & Putrawan, B. K. (2021). Kajian Pedagogis Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Di Era Pandemi Covid 19 : Studi Kasus Siswa Smk Harapan Bagi Bangsa, Jakarta Utara. 6(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.46307/rfidei.v6i1.83
Farley, E. (1996). Can Church Education Be Theological Education? In J. Astley, L. J. Francis, & C. Crowder (Ed.), Theological Perspectives on Christian Formation (hal. 31–44). W.B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Groome, T. H. (2017). Christian Religious Education; Pendidikan Agama Kristen (6 ed.). BPK Gunung Mulia.
Kouyoumdjian, H. (2012). Learning through visuals. Visual imagery in the classroom. Psychology Today.
Laboratory, H.-Ut. (2020). Society 5.0 A People-centric Super-smart. Springer.
Leungchopan. (2017). From Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: The big societal transformation plan of Japan. i-SCOOP.
Lundy, A. D., & Stephens, A. E. (2015). Beyond the Literal: Teaching Visual Literacy in the 21st Century Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.794
Mager, R. F. (1984). Preparing instructional objectives (2 ed.). David S. Lake.
Mayumi, F. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society. Japan SPOTLIGHT, 220, 47–50.
Miller, R. C. (1963). Education for Christian Living (2 ed.). Prentice Hall.
Murdiono, M. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Kewarganegaraan Berbasis Fortofolio. Ombak Yogyakarta.
Mustari, M., & Rahman, M. T. (2011). Nilai Karakter: Refleksi untuk Pendidikan Karakter. Raja Grafika Persada.
Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
Nelson, N. (2017). Visual Literacy and Library Instruction: A Critical Analysis. Education Libraries, 27(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.26443/el.v27i1.194
Nilasari, S. (2020). Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 terhadap Disiplin Kerja Guru. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 795–804.
Pangumbahas, R., & Winanto, O. N. (2021). Membaca Kembali Pandangan Moralitas Postmodernism Untuk Konteks Pendidikan Kristen. QUAERENS: Journal of Theology and Christianity Studies, 3(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.46362/quaerens.v3i1.33
Pazmiño, R. W. (2012). Foundational Issues in Christian Education: An Introduction in Evangelical Perspective (3 ed.). Baker Academic.
PH, S. (2013). Strategi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran di Indonesia. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Risdianto, E. (2019). Analisis Pendidikan Indonesia Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 383–388.
Roberts, B. A. (1970). Visual Literacy. California State University.
Sanner, A. E., & Harper, A. F. (Ed.). (1978). Exploring Christian Education. Beacon Hill Press.
Schensu, J. J. . (2012). Methodology, Methods, And Tools In Qualitative Research. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Riemer (Ed.), Qualitative research: an introduction to methods and designs. Jossey-Bass.
Slameto. (2012). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya (6 ed.). Bina Aksara.
Smith, D. (2020). Using Religious Images to Teach Visual Literacy. Atla Summary of Proceedings, 267–271. https://doi.org/10.31046/proceedings.2020.1872
Sutrisno, Hestiningrum, P., Lumingkewas, M. S., & Putrawan, B. K. (2021). Christian Religious Education Toward The Teenagers Character Building. Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 5(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.46445/ejti.v5i2.330
Takamitsu, S. (2019). Reforming Education for Society 5.0. The Japan Times.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource (10 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods. Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Chichester. Wiley-Blackwell.
Trozzo, W. (2021). The Return to Visual Communication in Christian Education. Christian Education Journal, 18(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739891320926177
Vieth, P. H. (1928). The Development of a Curriculum of Religious Education. The International Council of Religious Education.
Wang, F.-Y., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., & Qin, R. (2018). Societies 5.0: A New Paradigm for Computational Social Systems Research. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2018.2797598
White, T. R. (2012). Visual Literacy and Cultural Production: Examining Black Masculinity through Participatory Community Engagement. Journal of Visual Literacy, 31(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2012.11674694
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
Yulianto. (2021). The Needs of Training to Improve Teacher Competence in Preparing Society 5.0. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 20(1), 275–286.
Copyright (c) 2021 Yusak Tanasyah, Bobby Kurnia Putrawan, Sutrisno Sutrisno, Iswahyudi Iswahyudi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Visio Dei: Jurnal Teologi Kristen publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0). Users are free to copy, modify, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any media, provided they give appropriate credit to the original author and Visio Dei: Jurnal Teologi Kristen as the publisher, links to the license, indicate if changes have been made, and redistribute any derivative works under the same license.
Article copyright is held by the respective author (s), without limitation. A non-exclusive license is granted to Visio Dei: Jurnal Teologi Kristen to publish articles and identify itself as the original publisher, including commercial rights to sell them to libraries and individuals.
By publishing articles in Visio Dei: Jurnal Teologi Kristen, authors grant rights to third parties to use their articles to the extent granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
